tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1298974142445162186.post8209462776312110974..comments2024-03-19T15:58:12.198+08:00Comments on 搞笑談軟工: 校稿校到眼脫窗Teddy Chenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02066842119056439711noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1298974142445162186.post-88427779451685217522017-05-11T00:55:05.154+08:002017-05-11T00:55:05.154+08:00本來潛水做功課的...結果浮起來校稿 = =...不是動詞後面用"得"...而是...本來潛水做功課的...結果浮起來校稿 = =...不是動詞後面用"得"...而是動詞+("得"+副詞)...就不會怪怪的了sjdwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09432278816636787188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1298974142445162186.post-21757191586114990232012-06-18T18:10:00.569+08:002012-06-18T18:10:00.569+08:00To Unknown:
呵呵,中文太博大精深了...而且編輯可能以為Teddy故意亂寫...誰叫這...To Unknown:<br /><br />呵呵,中文太博大精深了...而且編輯可能以為Teddy故意亂寫...誰叫這本書的內容都在胡說八道哩...XD。Teddy Chenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02066842119056439711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1298974142445162186.post-16198818693184314942012-06-13T19:06:46.145+08:002012-06-13T19:06:46.145+08:00理論上這種問題(中文的正確寫法)應該編輯可以解決。理論上這種問題(中文的正確寫法)應該編輯可以解決。billhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10919132049287060785noreply@blogger.com